Legal Opinion
Dedis v. Chater
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided February 11, 1997No. Civil Action 95-30243-MAPPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PONSOR, District Judge.
This Recommendation is hereby ADOPTED, without objection. The Commissioner’s Motion to Affirm (Dkt. No. 10) is DENIED. The plaintiffs Motion for Judgment (Dkt. No. 9) is ALLOWED, in part. The clerk will enter judgment for plaintiff. So ordered.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION WITH REGARD TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT ON THE PLEADINGS (Docket No. 09) AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR ORDER AFFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE COMMISSIONER (Docket No. 10)
December 30, 1996
NEIMAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This matter is before the Court pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Bowen v. YuckertSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Universal Camera Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Rohrberg v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1998
- Lord v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2000
- Arruda v. BarnhartDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2004
- Smith v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2019
- Jakubiak v. BerryhillDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.