Legal Opinion
Rohrberg v. Apfel
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided November 12, 1998No. Civil Action 98-30003-FHFPublishedCited by 99 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
FREEDMAN, Senior District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
This action is before the Court pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act (“the Act”) which provides for judicial review of a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) respecting an individual’s entitlement to benefits. See 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Plaintiff Jill Rohrberg (“Rohrberg”) is seeking a period of Social Security Disability Insurance (“SSDI”). Plaintiff alleges that the Commissioner’s decision denying her the sought-after benefits is erroneous and is not supported by substantial…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Victor J. Irlanda Ortiz v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Maria S. Rodriguez v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1981
- Herbert Carroll v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Nicasio RODRIGUEZ PAGAN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. SECRETARY OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, Defendant, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by99 opinions
- Deskin v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008
- Dennis v. ColvinDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2016
- Musto v. HalterDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2001
- Bazile v. ApfelDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2000
- Arrington v. ColvinDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
94 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.