Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Werblud
Texas Supreme Court
Decided June 9, 1976No. B-5639PublishedCited by 169 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
POPE, Justice.
Maurice Werblud applied for writ of ha-beas corpus to obtain his release from custody for his failure to pay two fines, each in the sum of $500 for violations of a temporary injunction committed on different days. On July 28, 1975, the 54th Judicial District Court temporarily enjoined Wer-blud from operating his rendering plant, Texas Pet Foods, Inc., in certain designated ways because it was emitting noxious odors in violation of the Texas Clean Air Act, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4477-5 (pamp. supp. 1974), and the Renderers’ Licensing Act, Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat.Ann. art. 4477-6…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Gompers v. Bucks Stove & Range Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Shillitani v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Bloom v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Taylor v. HayesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by169 opinions
- In Re ReeceTexas Supreme Court · 2011
- Ex Parte GordonTexas Supreme Court · 1979
- In Re LongTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- Schultz v. Fifth Judicial District Court of Appeals at DallasTexas Supreme Court · 1991
- Ex Parte Hawkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1994
164 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.