Legal Opinion

Demars v. Koehler

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 15, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On error to the Essex County Circuit-Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Lippincott, J.

The plaintiff below, who is plaintiff in error in this court, instituted an action against the defendant to recover damages for the breach of a covenant against encumbrances contained in a deed of conveyance in fee-simple of lands and premises situate in the city of Newark.

The deed of conveyance was made, executed and delivered by the defendant and his wife to the plaintiff on .the 10th day of February, 1896. The deed of conveyance contained the usual covenant against encumbrances. On October 14th, 1895, the defendant made a verbal lease…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fritz v. PuseySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1884
  2. Crosby v. LoopIllinois Supreme Court · 1852
  3. Lindley v. DakinIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Kellum v. Berkshire Life InsuranceIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Haldane v. SweetMichigan Supreme Court · 1884

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Demars v. KoehlerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
  2. Brown v. TaylorTennessee Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Ream v. GosleeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API