Legal Opinion
Eubanks v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided January 23, 1992No. 114-88 CPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HORN, Judge.
This case is presently before the court on the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, and on the plaintiff intervenors’ separate Motion to Dismiss. Following a review of the filings in this case and after oral argument on the motions, for the reasons discussed below, the court, hereby, GRANTS the defendant’s Motion to Dismiss.
BACKGROUND
Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1437f (1988), the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) is authorized to enter into annual contribution contracts with public housing authorities. An annual…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. SherwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Christianson v. Colt Industries Operating Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Arizona v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Stew Farm, Ltd. v. Natural Resource Conservation ServiceDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2013
- Garreaux v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2007
- Lewis v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
- Frank & Breslow, LLP v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Capitol Boulevard Partners v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1994
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.