Legal Opinion
Mobile Discount Corp. v. Price
Nevada Supreme Court
Decided January 20, 1983No. 13845PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
On May 4, 1970, respondents George and Doris Price purchased a mobile home on a retail installment contract from E-Z Livin’ Mobile Home Sales, Inc. (E-Z Livin’). On the very same day, E-Z Livin’ assigned the contract to Western Coach who in turn assigned it to Fidelity Acceptance Corporation. After several other mesne assignments, the contract was finally assigned to appellant Mobile Discount Corporation, Inc. (Mobile) on April 9, 1980.
Pursuant to the installment contract, the Prices made twelve consecutive payments of $105 each and none thereafter, leaving a balance due of $11,334.40.…
3Cases cited7 opinions
- Whisenhunt v. Allen Parker Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
- Jarnagin v. DitusSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
- Tom Boudreau and Mary Belle Boudreau, Husband and Wife v. Borg-Warner Acceptance Corporation, a Delaware Corporation, DefendantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
- Martindell v. BodreroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967
- Hamilton v. PearceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- First of America Bank v. ThompsonMichigan Court of Appeals · 1996
- Scott v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Butcher v. GilroyCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1987
- Thomson v. Sunny Ridge Village PartnershipIdaho Court of Appeals · 1990
- Scott v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1997