Mamlin v. Tener (Et Ux.)
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Baldrige, J.,
The plaintiff, Hyman Mamlin, brought suit in assumpsit before a magistrate against “Mr. and Mrs. Richard Tener.” Judgment was obtained and a transcript of the record was filed in the municipal court. About 18 months thereafter the plaintiff caused to be issued an attachment sur judgment in which the City of Philadelphia Police Beneficiary Association was summoned as garnishee. Interrogatories were filed and the garnishee’s answer thereto admitted it had funds payable to Mary T. Tener. A rule for judgment against the garnishee was made absolute. Mary T. Tener filed a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Simpson's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Mintz v. MintzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
- Doerr v. GraybillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1904
3Cited by11 opinions
- Dunlap v. LarkinSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
- Meritor Motgage Corp.—East v. HendersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Green Ridge Bank v. EdwardsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Vichosky v. BoucherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
- Polis v. Raphael Et Ux.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1947
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.