Legal Opinion

Riffey v. Rush

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1924PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This is an appeal from an order of the district court of Ward county, denying a preliminary restraining order during the pendency of the action.

Plaintiffs, residents of Minot, commenced this action for the purpose!' of enjoining the defendants from erecting a grand stand and fence in and around a place intended to be used for a baseball park; from playing baseball on the premises; and from allowing large crowds of boisterous and noisy persons to gather and trespass on the premises of the defendants.

The plaintiffs allege that they are the owners of ceidain property situated in the city of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Gilbough v. West Side Amusement Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1902
  2. Sand ex rel. All other Taxpayers of Scott School District No. 12 v. PetersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Cronin v. BloemeckeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1899
  4. Seastream v. New Jersey Exhibition Co.New Jersey Court of Chancery · 1904

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Warren Company v. DicksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  2. City of Lynchburg v. PetersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1926
  3. Amdor v. CooneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
  4. Johnson v. DrysdaleSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Smith v. GrilkNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1933

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API