Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Estate of Hill

California Court of Appeal

Decided September 24, 1928No. Docket No. 6381PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BEAUMONT, J., pro tem.

Lucile Knowland Hill died testate December 25, 1926. Among the legatees named in her will were the following: Robert Lewis Hill, her husband; William F. (Russell) Knowland; E. Harold Dana and Louise Hoover Dunbar. The only heirs at law of decedent were Robert Lewis Hill and Joseph R. Knowland, a brother. Petitions for partial distribution were filed by E. Harold Dana and Louise Hoover Dunbar, residuary legatees, praying for distribution to each of $15,000. These were resisted by said Robert Lewis Hill and Joseph R. Knowland. Following the hearing on the petitions, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. William Hill Co. v. LawlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  2. In re the estate of MooreCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. In Re the Estate of RossCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. In re Estate of PainterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  5. In Re Estate of GlennCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Estate of BuchmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  2. Barreiro v. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
  3. Estate of FletcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  4. Peterson v. PetersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Cohn v. Anglo-California National BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API