Legal Opinion

Haynes v. Marshall

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided October 12, 1989No. 88-3969PublishedCited by 64 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALAN E. NORRIS, Circuit Judge.

Defendants are prison officials and law enforcement personnel at the Southern Ohio Correctional Facility (“SOCF”) who were sued in their individual and official capacities for damages resulting from the death of an inmate, Jimmy J. Haynes. He died from injuries received while being moved from the prison infirmary to a security cell. Defendants appeal from the denial of their motions for summary judgment seeking qualified immunity from Haynes’ claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. *702Also involved is their appeal from the district court’s decision to exercise pendent…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Whitley v. AlbersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Ingraham v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by64 opinions

  1. Hudson v. McMillianSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Melda Turker v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
  3. Regina McCormick v. Miami UniversityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  4. Conley v. ShearerOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  5. Michael R. Cornwell, Cross-Appellant v. Eric G. Dahlberg, Dennis R. Baker, Sgt. Tony Wilson, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1992

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API