Nalezinek v. Union Bank & Trust Co.
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtStephan, J.
We are asked to determine how the residue of the estate of Otto A. Eickmeyer (testator) should be distributed. Three of the five devisees named in the residuary clause of the testator’s will predeceased him. Two died without issue. The third was survived by a daughter, appellant Lana Nalezinek. The parties agree that pursuant to the antilapse statute, Neb. Rev. Stat. § 30-2343 (Reissue 1995), Nalezinek is entitled to that portion of the residuary estate specifically devised to her father, Harry Eickmeyer. The single question of law presented for review is whether Nalezinek is also entitled to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Central States Foundation v. BalkaNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
- Mertz v. Pharmacists Mutual InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Benitez v. RasmussenNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Armour v. L.H.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Lincoln v. Nebraska Liquor Control CommissionNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Premium Farms v. County of HoltNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- Soto v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- Mogensen v. Board of SupervisorsNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
- Nicholson v. General Cas. Co. of WisconsinNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. RheaNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.