Mertz v. Pharmacists Mutual Insurance
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtConnolly, J.
Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Company (Pharmacists) appeals from a summary judgment order in favor of appellee, Patrick J. Mertz, a former employee. The district court found a covenant not to compete clause in the party’s employment agreement unenforceable.
The threshold question in this appeal is whether we apply Nebraska or Iowa substantive law. We look to the Restatement (Second) of Conflict of Laws §§ 6 and 196 (1971) to determine the enforceability of the noncompete clause. Applying the above sections, we determine Nebraska law controls, and the covenant’s restriction is greater than is…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Philip G. Johnson & Co. v. SalmenNebraska Supreme Court · 1982
- Chambers-Dobson, Inc. v. SquierNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
- Polly v. Ray D. Hilderman & Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
- Moore v. Eggers Consulting Co., Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
- American Security Services, Inc. v. VodraNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Aon Consulting v. Midlands FinancialNebraska Supreme Court · 2008
- Dcs Sanitation Management, Inc. v. Eloy Castillo Efren George Castillo Adolfo MartinezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
- Johnson v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2005
- In Re Guardianship of DonleyNebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Coral Production Corp. v. Central Resources, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2007
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.