Legal Opinion

United States v. Philip Morris USA Inc.

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided January 26, 2012No. Civil Action No. 1999-2496PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

GLADYS KESSLER, District Judge.

On November 17, 2011, the parties were ordered to submit their views on (1) whether the Court should defer consideration of the issue of corrective action statements (as well as the issue of advertisement placement in retail stores); and (2) if so, for how long such consideration should be deferred. The parties have responded.

The Court has concluded, for the following reasons, that there will be no deferral of decision-making regarding the corrective action statements.

1. It is perfectly clear from Defendants’ Response that the litigation…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Belize Social Development Ltd. v. Government of BelizeCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2012
  3. United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2006
  4. United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  5. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. United States Food & Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States Securities & Exchange Commission v. Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu CPA Ltd.District Court, District of Columbia · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API