Legal Opinion

R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. v. United States Food & Drug Administration

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 7, 2011No. Civil Case 11-1482 (RJL)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

RICHARD J. LEON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs in this case (“plaintiffs”) are five tobacco companies, which include the second-, third-, and fourth-largest tobacco manufacturers and the fifth-largest cigarette manufacturer in the United States. Complaint (“Compl.”), Aug. 16, 2011, ¶¶ 8-12 [Dkt. # 1], In June 2011, defendant United States Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) published a Final Rule requiring (among other things) the display of nine new textual warnings — along with certain graphic images 1 such as diseased lungs and a cadaver bearing chest staples on an autopsy…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Rosenberger v. Rector & Visitors of University of VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  4. Wooley v. MaynardSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. New York Times Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Discount Tobacco City & Lottery, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
  2. Geo Specialty Chemicals, Incorporated v. HusisianDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
  3. United States v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. R J Reynolds Tobacco v. FDACourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2024
  5. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. United States Food and Drug AdministrationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API