Legal Opinion
McCarthy v. Cincinnati Enquirer, Inc.
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided May 7, 1956No. 8022PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHildebrant, J.
This is an appeal on questions of law.
Plaintiff, appellant herein, seeks damages for defamation predicated upon the following editorial, entitled, “Fluoridation : The Facts, ’ ’ together with a paragraph on the same page headed, “The Voice of the Enquirer.”:
“In the last few days we have had a depressing demonstration of how much harm one news broadcaster can do in a community. We refer to the daily efforts of Tom McCarthy of WKRC to create distrust of our public health authorities by misrepresenting the effects of fluoridation of our water supply, scheduled to begin on Sunday.
“By misleading…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Westropp v. E. W. Scripps Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Sweeney v. Beacon Journal Publishing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1941
- Holloway v. Scripps Publishing Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1919
3Cited by10 opinions
- Tohline v. Central Trust Co., N.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1988
- Hedrick v. Center for Comprehensive Alcoholism TreatmentOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
- Watley v. Dept. of Rehab. Corr., 07ap-902 (7-24-2008)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2008
- Whitt Sturtevant, L.L.P. v. NC Plaza L.L.C.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2015
- Wood v. DorcasOhio Court of Appeals · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.