Legal Opinion

Westropp v. E. W. Scripps Co.

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided August 6, 1947No. 30744PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMatthias, J.

The appellant, who will be hereinafter referred to as the plaintiff, has assigned numerous claims of prejudicial error of the trial court, the mo.st important being the refusal to instruct the jury that the publication complained of was libelous per se. That issue was squarely presented to the court by a request of counsel for the plaintiff to give the following instruction before argument:

“I charge you as a matter of law that the publication of- the editorial and pictures which is the subject matter of the plaintiff’s complaint and which is set forth in her petition, was defamatory and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Morrison v. . SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Bosjnak v. Superior Sheet Steel Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Culmer v. CanbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1900
  4. Sanford v. RowleyMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Jones v. RobertsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Gosden v. LouisOhio Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Thomas H. Maloney & Sons, Inc. v. E. W. Scripps Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. Hedrick v. Center for Comprehensive Alcoholism TreatmentOhio Court of Appeals · 1982
  4. Onderko v. Richmond Manufacturing Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Gough v. Tribune-Journal CompanyIdaho Supreme Court · 1954

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API