Legal Opinion
Reiman v. Moore
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 28, 1940No. Civ. 6349PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PARKER, J., pro tem.
The case was before the court at an earlier stage and the opinion of the court on that proceeding is found in 30 Cal. App. (2d) 306 [86 Pac. (2d) 156]. We mention this at the outset, as reference will hereinafter be made thereto with relation to the law of the case as the rule may apply.
The case was tried before a jury and the judgment followed a verdict in favor of the plaintiff.
On this appeal no complaint is made as to any of the rulings in the trial court nor is any fault found in the instructions to the jury. The sole claim is that, accepting the facts as presented by…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Perry v. LevySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1915
- Spore v. WashingtonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
- Smelser v. Deutsche Evangelische Lutherische Gemeinde Der St. Markus KircheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- O. J. Gude Co. v. FarleyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1899
- Leuch v. DessertWashington Supreme Court · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Harris v. JoffeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
- Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard CafeteriaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
- Rothberg v. BradleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
- Ephraim Dabush v. Seacret Direct LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Thompson Ex Rel. Thompson v. Paseo Manor South, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1959
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.