Legal Opinion

O. J. Gude Co. v. Farley

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1899PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Municipal Court, first district, borough of Manhattan, rendered in favor' of the plaintiff.

1Opinion of the CourtMacLean, J.

The action is in the nature of trespass to recover damages to personal property. The testimony and exhibits in another action between the same parties for conversion have been stipulated to be the record in this case. The facts are as follows: On March 27, 1897, one James McEnery, who was the owner of the premises situated at the corner of Myrtle avenue and Bridge street, Brooklyn, demised the entire building, with the appurtenances, to one Daniel McMenamey for the term of one' year from the 1st day of May, 1897, with the privilege of renewal upon certain conditions, by a lease containing the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Reynolds v. . Van BeurenNew York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Lyon v. Bethlehem Engineering Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Reiman v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
  3. Smelser v. Deutsche Evangelische Lutherische Gemeinde Der St. Markus KircheCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
  4. Leuch v. DessertWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Pocher v. HallAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1906

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API