Legal Opinion

State v. Karna

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2016No. 20160156PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANDSTROM, Justice;

[¶ 1] Dean Kama appeals the judgment entered on conditional pleas of guilty to the charges of possession of a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia. The issue is whether the district court erred in denying Kama’s motion to suppress evidence obtained by law enforcement while searching his home without a warrant. We affirm.

I

[¶ 2] In 2015, a McLean County Sheriffs dispatcher received a phone call from Kama’s brother stating Kama told him he had shot their father. Sheriffs deputies were familiar with the Kama family. They knew Dean Kama and his father lived…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. City of Fairgo v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
  2. State v. DeCoteauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  3. State v. KitchenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Anderson v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2005
  5. United States v. Frederick CooperCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. FrieszNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2017
  2. State v. GardnerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019
  3. State v. BlackNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  4. United States v. GiambroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2025
  5. State v. KomroskyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API