Legal Opinion

Banks v. Chiffy

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County

Decided April 21, 1995No. 5308 S 1992PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURGEON, J„

On May 6, 1994, a jury rendered a verdict in favor of plaintiff Margaret Banks in the amount of $135,000 for injuries she sustained in a motor vehicle accident with defendant Adam Chiffy. Because of the $25,000 policy limit under defendant’s automobile policy with Nationwide Insurance Company, plaintiff commenced garnishment proceedings against Nationwide, as a garnishee, in order to enforce her excess judgment. Defendant’s legal representation at trial had been provided by Nationwide.

*342The plaintiff’s theory of recovery is that Nationwide acted in bad faith in failing to accept an…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gray v. Nationwide Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1966
  2. Cowden v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  3. Romano v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  4. Shearer v. ReedSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Hall v. BrownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Dennis Haugh v. Allstate Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
  2. Shoemaker v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API