Legal Opinion

Shoemaker v. Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Co.

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 13, 2001No. 99-574Published

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CAIAZZA 1 , United States Magistrate Judge.

Now before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. For the reasons stated below, the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 43) will be granted, the Plaintiffs “Motion for Summary Judgment on Count I of [the] Complaint [Breach of Contract]” (Doc. 39) will be denied, and this case will be dismissed with prejudice.

BACKGROUND

In this diversity action, the Plaintiff presents breach of contract and bad faith claims arising out of an “Employee Dishonesty” Policy (“the Policy”) issued by the Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Resolution Trust Corporation v. Fidelity And Deposit Company Of MarylandCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2000
  2. Peoples Bank & Trust Company of Madison County v. The Aetna Casualty & Surety Company and the Ohio Casualty Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. Lynch Properties, Inc. v. Potomac Insurance Co. of IllinoisDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1996
  4. Susquehanna Bancshares, Inc. v. National Union Fire InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Banks v. Chiffy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API