Legal Opinion · Dissent

Bayer v. Johnson

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1987No. 15224Published

1DissentMorgan, Justice

I dissent.

The first chapter of Mr. Bayer’s travails involving sales tax actually began in 1981 when he was hailed into magistrate court in Sioux Falls charged with three felony violations of failure to file sales and service tax returns relating to his bookmaking business. SDCL 10-45-49.1. He entered into a plea bargain agreement, adopted by the court, whereby he was given probation upon the conditions: (1) That he pay $62,-500 in back taxes, penalties and interest; (2) that he adopt appropriate sales tax record-keeping procedures; and (3) that he have no further violations of SDCL ch. 10-45.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bartron v. Codington CountySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Bayer v. JohnsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Beverage Co. v. Villa Marie Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1944
  4. E. P. Wilbur Trust Co. v. FahrendorfSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1936
  5. State v. BayerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API