Legal Opinion

St. George v. Meyer

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1937No. L. A. No. 15769PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtLangdon, J.

This is an action to set aside a sale under a deed of trust. Defendant had judgment and plaintiff appealed.

The bulk of plaintiff’s brief is devoted to the proposition that deeds of trust are but mortgages, which must be foreclosed by a judicial proceeding. This question is no longer open in California. (Bank of Italy Nat. T. & S. Assn. v. Bentley, 217 Cal. 644 [20 Pac. (2d) 940].; Medico-Denial Discount Corp. v. Title Ins. & Trust Co., 11 Cal. App. (2d) 200 [53 Pac. (2d) 386].)

The objection that the provision in the instrument for payment in gold coin necessitated judicial foreclosure is…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Bank of Italy National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. BentleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Hewitt v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Nineteenth Realty Co. v. DiggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. American National Bank v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1932
  5. Berkeley Guarantee Building & Loan Ass'n v. CunnynghamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Busch v. TorresDistrict Court, C.D. California · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API