Legal Opinion

Berkeley Guarantee Building & Loan Ass'n v. Cunnyngham

California Supreme Court

Decided August 25, 1933No. Docket No. S.F. 14940PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Respondent has moved to dismiss the appeal in this cause. The action was one in unlawful detainer under the provisions of section 1161a of the Code of Civil Procedure, filed in the Justice’s Court of Brooklyn Township, Alameda County. Judgment was rendered in favor of plaintiff and against defendants. On appeal to the Superior Court of Alameda County, the judgment was affirmed and remittitur was issued on May 9, 1933. Defendants thereupon gave notice of appeal to the Supreme Court from the judgment of the superior court. The motion is to dismiss this appeal on the ground that the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Johnston v. WolfCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Hewitt v. Justice's CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. McLean v. FreibergerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cheney v. TrauzettelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Nineteenth Realty Co. v. DiggsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  3. Harris v. SeidellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934
  4. Higgins v. CoyneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  5. Kelliher v. KelliherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API