Legal Opinion
United States v. Pui Kan Lam
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 21, 1973No. 888, 889, Dockets 73-1150, 73-1270PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OAKES, Circuit Judge:
Following a two-week trial before the late Hon. George Rosling and a jury in the Eastern District of New York, appellants Pui Kan Lam (“Kan Lam”), Pui Leung Lam (“Leung Lam”), Wai Kwok Yip (“Kwok Yip”) and Wai Kwon Yip (“Kwon Yip”) were found guilty on one count of possessing with intent to distribute approximately three pounds of heroin. 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(1). 1 On this appeal all appellants claim that an electronic interception of a conversation between appellants Kan Lam and Kwok Yip was illegal and that a tape recording of that conversation was erroneously admitted…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Katz v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Alderman v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- United States v. Paul v. OatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
- Commonwealth v. SellSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
- United States v. Yvette Carson, Lemuel Mont, A/K/A "Lam," and Kenneth Thomas, A/K/A "Kenneth Davis,"Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Jo Ann Harrelson, Charles Voyed Harrelson and Elizabeth Nichols ChagraCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Joseph Pitre Edwyn Pitre Angel M. Otero Richard PitreCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.