Modoc Mineral & Oil Co. v. Cal-Vada Drilling & Exploration Co.
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtPierce, P. J.
Defendants appeal from a judgment granting plaintiff rescission of an oil well drilling contract and awarding plaintiff $32,815.25 in damages.
Defendants’ principal argument on appeal is that the trial court acted on insufficient evidence in finding that a certain written instrument entitled a “lease agreement” dated June 9, 1960, was not the true agreement between the parties. All other arguments, excepting one to be noted below, rest upon the existence and binding effect of that agreement.
The facts found by the trial court include the following: that prior to June 9, 1960, defendant Reeves,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hobart v. Hobart Estate Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Overton v. Vita-Food Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1949
- Steiner v. RowleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Rosemead Co. v. Shipley Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jennings v. LeeArizona Supreme Court · 1969
- Leaf v. Phil Rauch, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1975
- Roam v. KoopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1974
- Phillips v. MercerNevada Supreme Court · 1978
- City Bank of San Diego v. RamageCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.