Legal Opinion

McKay v. Wilderness Development, LLC

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 27, 2009No. DA 08-0299PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Warner

¶1 Craig and Lisa McKay brought suit against Wilderness Development, LLC (Wilderness), in the District Court of the Nineteenth Judicial District Court, Lincoln County, alleging it had violated restrictive covenants attached to the Koocanusa Estates Subdivision near Eureka, Montana (Subdivision). The McKays also alleged that Wilderness had trespassed on their property and converted some of their trees. The District Court granted partial summary judgment to the McKays, holding that Wilderness had violated a restrictive covenant. A Lincoln County jury found that the McKays had suffered $350,000…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Sacco v. High Country Independent Press, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Seltzer v. MortonMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Kiely Construction, L.L.C. v. City of Red Lodge Ex Rel. Red Lodge City CouncilMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Jacobsen v. Allstate InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2009

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Tacke v. Energy West, Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Olsen v. MilnerMontana Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Bennett v. HillMontana Supreme Court · 2015
  4. 623 Partners, LLC v. HunterMontana Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Cossitt v. Flathead Indus., Inc.Montana Supreme Court · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API