Legal Opinion

Barton v. Capitol Market

California Court of Appeal

Decided March 4, 1943No. Civ. 12244PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPeters, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals from a judgment of nonsuit. The action was instituted by plaintiff to recover for personal injuries received when she slipped and fell on the sidewalk bordering defendants’ place of business. The theory of plaintiff was that defendants had frequently sprayed the corner of the building where the accident occurred, resulting in an oily, slippery stain running down the building and across the sidewalk upon which she slipped. At the con elusion of plaintiff’s case defendants moved for a nonsuit on the grounds that no evidence had been offered to show that defendants had placed…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Estate of LancesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Gavin v. Protestant Episcopal BishopCalifornia Supreme Court · 1933
  3. Estate of SharonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Berger v. LaneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Perera v. Panama-Pacific International Exp. Co.California Supreme Court · 1918

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Carson v. Facilities Development Co.California Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Kopfinger v. Grand Central Public MarketCalifornia Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Winston v. HansellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  4. Selger v. Steven Brothers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1990
  5. Williamson v. Pacific Greyhound LinesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API