Legal Opinion

Hooper v. Smith

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 15, 1916No. Civ. No. 1541PublishedCited by 1 opinion

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Solano County. W. T. O’Donnell, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

ELLISON, J.,

pro tem. — The complaint in this action was filed January 20, 1915. The first paragraph thereof alleges that the plaintiff is a copartnership. The second paragraph is: “That on the 1st day of January, 1915, the defendant above named was indebted to plaintiffs above named in the sum of five hundred and fifty dollars and 42/100 ($550.42) on an open boob account for goods, groceries, wares and merchandise sold and delivered by plaintiffs above named to defendant above named, between the 1st day of September, 1911, and the 31st day of August, 1914, at defendant’s special instances and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Curtin v. KowalskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Pryce v. JordanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Catanich v. HayesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1877
  4. Rock Ridge Park Co. v. WellsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Licht v. GallatinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API