Pryce v. Jordan
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Cruz County. The action was brought on a promissory note by an indorsee. The further facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtMcKee, J.
In this case the defendant interposed a demurrer to the complaint in the action, on the ground that the statement of facts was insufficient to constitute a cause of action.
The demurrer was overruled, and that is assigned as error.
The statement in the complaint shows that on the 15th of December, 1879, defendant made and delivered to Charles E. Russel the promissory note upon which the action is founded; that the note was payable to Russel or order; that Russel, on the 10th of July, 1881, *571“indorsed, assigned, and delivered the note to the plaintiff”; that no part of the same has been paid, and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Poorman v. D. O. Mills & Co.California Supreme Court · 1868
- Hook v. WhiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
- Wedderspoon v. RogersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1867
3Cited by9 opinions
- Curtin v. KowalskyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Fowler v. FowlerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
- Kennedy & Shaw Lumber Co. v. S. S. Construction Co.California Supreme Court · 1899
- Citizens State Bank v. E. A. Tessman & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- First National Bank v. StalloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.