Legal Opinion

People v. Byrd

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided January 7, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William Mogulescu, J.

Defendant is charged with loitering for the purpose of *351prostitution (Penal Law § 240.37 [2]).* By notice of motion, dated November 26, 1990, the defendant moves to dismiss the accusatory instrument on the ground that the information is facially insufficient.

The accusatory instrument states in relevant part:

"Deponent observed the defendant loiter and wander for a period of approximately 10-15 minutes during which time the defendant beckoned to passing traffic and stopped 3 male passers-by and/or motorists.
"Moreover, the defendant’s general deportment…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. AlejandroNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. People v. DumasNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. People v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1977
  4. People v. SeabrooksCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. People v. BarkerAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2014
  2. People v. HabenichtNassau County District Court · 1992
  3. People v. TellesCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API