Legal Opinion

People v. Smith

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1977PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from an order, dated October 15, 1976 (Altman, J.), dismissing an accusatory instrument charging the defendant with loitering for the purpose of engaging in a prostitution offense, in violation of section 240.37 of the Penal Law. The court below concluded that section 240.37 is "vague, overbroad and inhibits free speech” (88 Misc 2d 590, 601). We disagree.

In relevant part, section 240.37 provides that: "Any person who remains or wanders about in a public place and repeatedly beckons to, or repeatedly stops, or repeatedly attempts to stop, or repeatedly attempts to engage…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. United States v. HarrissSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. People v. PagnottaNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. BorreroNew York Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. People v. WachowiczNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  5. People v. BerckNew York Court of Appeals · 1973

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Northern Virginia Chapter v. City of AlexandriaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1990
  2. People v. ByrdCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1991
  3. People v. SeabrooksCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1980
  4. People v. SmithNew York Court of Appeals · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API