Carpenter v. Double R Cattle Co., Inc.
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
ON REHEARING
This opinion supersedes the Court’s prior opinion issued on August 31, 1982, which is withdrawn.
BURNETT, Judge.
Dean William Prosser once observed, “There is perhaps no more impenetrable jungle in the entire law than that which surrounds the word ‘nuisance’.” W. PROS-SER, HANDBOOK OF THE LAW OF TORTS, § 86, at 571 (4th ed. 1971). Today we review a case that has thrust us into the jungle of nuisance law. We are asked to define the legal test for determining whether an intended use of property, which incidentally produces adverse effects upon neighboring properties, constitutes a…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- New York City v. PineSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Boomer v. Atlantic Cement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1970
- Ryan v. City of EmmetsburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Pendergrast v. AikenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Amphitheaters, Inc. v. Portland MeadowsOregon Supreme Court · 1948
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Marc Feldman v. Allstate Insurance Company Vicki WeedCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Padilla v. LawrenceNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1984
- Carpenter v. Double R Cattle Co., Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1985
- Moon v. North Idaho Farmers Ass'nIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Crea v. CreaIdaho Supreme Court · 2000
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.