Edward Dell v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1ConcurrenceMartin, Circuit Judge
Our precedent requires the outcome reached by the majority here and I therefore concur in the result. As the majority opinion sets out, a person who has been convicted of a crime, but whose lawyer failed to raise a point of law that could have lessened the sentence for that conviction, has a heavy burden to later get the benefit of the overlooked legal principle. It is black letter law that he must meet the “plain error” standard of review. The difficulty in showing “plain error” is intended to foster a system where parties must tell a court when it has made a mistake, so the court can fix it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Kimbrough v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- United States v. Dominguez BenitezSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Dorsey v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2012
- Federal Communications Commission v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2012
- United States v. RodriguezCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.