Legal Opinion

Blanchard v. Sheldon

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided February 15, 1871PublishedCited by 29 opinions

This.was an. action of trover, wherein the plaintiff claimed to recover for the alleged conversion of an instrument in writing. Plea, the general issue. Trial' by jury, September term, 1870, Barrett, J., presiding. Upon the facts, which are fully stated in the opinion of the court, the county court ruled pro forma that the plaintiff was entitled .to recover, and directed a verdict for the plaintiff, to which the defendant excepted.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Ross, J.

The' plaintiff has brought this action, in trover, to recover the value of an instrument in writing, as follows :

“ For value received I promise to pay Aurilla Ballou, three hundred dollars with annual interest, if she called for it before she deceased, if not, to be paid to Daniel M. Blanchard by her order. Henry L. Sheldon.

Miranda Hines.

“ January 12, 1867.”

*513The makers are pecuniarily responsible and have paid the whole amount, evidenced thereby, to the defendant, who is the executor of the last will of Aurilla Ballou. The only question in the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Caldwell v. RenfrewSupreme Court of Vermont · 1860
  2. French v. RaymondSupreme Court of Vermont · 1867

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. United States v. IrvineSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. Hynes v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
  3. Phillips v. PlastridgeSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935
  4. Union Trust Co. v. HawkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Goelz v. People's Savings BankIndiana Court of Appeals · 1903

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API