Legal Opinion
Union Trust Co. v. Hawkins
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided May 31, 1928No. 20680PublishedCited by 28 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall, C. J.
These two agreements must be construed together as one and as of the date of the supplemental agreement, to wit, January 22, 1923. It results that the legislation enacted August 14, 1921, must be read into the agreements. The controversy relates to that paragraph of the supplemental agreement reading as follows:
“If the trust created by said agreement shall not be terminated during the lifetime of first party as herein provided it shall terminate on her death and said note and mortgage, or the proceeds thereof, shall be paid over, transferred, and distributed share and share alike to Edward…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Van Cott v. . PrenticeNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
- In re Estate of SoulardSupreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Robb v. . Washington Jefferson CollegeNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Estate of SmithPennsylvania Orphans' Court, Philadelphia County · 1891
- Allen-West Commission Co. v. GrumblesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1904
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Cleveland Trust Co. v. WhiteOhio Supreme Court · 1938
- Goodrich v. City National Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1935
- Rose v. Union Guardian Trust Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1942
- Central Trust Co. v. WattOhio Supreme Court · 1941
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.