Legal Opinion

Heritage Mutual Insurance v. Thoma

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 3, 1970No. 52PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRobert W. Hansen, J.

Three questions will be answered in this decision, even though only one is asked on this appeal, with the reasons for so doing noted in the opinion.

Motion to amend.

Could or should the trial court have granted plaintiffs motion to amend its pleadings ?

While no issue is raised as to the trial court’s denying the motion to amend, appellant appears to find something wrong with allowing the plaintiff to plead over, initially attempting to recover subrogation without proving joint liability, and, if that attempt fails, to recover contribution by proving joint liability. We do not. It is permissible…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wurtzinger v. JacobsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Barry Laboratories, Inc. v. State Board of PharmacyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. Seraphine v. HardimanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  4. Perkins v. WorzalaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  5. Szuszka v. City of MilwaukeeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1961

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Coleman v. PercyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Lassa v. RongstadWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  3. Gustavson v. O'BRIENWisconsin Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Admiral Insurance v. Paper Converting Machine Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2012
  5. D. R. W. Corporation v. CordesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API