Williams v. State
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
Nicholas Jabbar Williams v. State of Maryland, No. 37, September Term, 2021 ALLEGED LEGAL OR FACTUAL INCONSISTENCIES IN VERDICTS – NO- IMPEACHMENT RULE – MARYLAND RULE 5-606(b) – SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE – Court of Appeals held that guilty verdict as to second-degree murder was not legally inconsistent with not-guilty verdicts as to first-degree assault and use of firearm in commission of crime of violence (second-degree murder) because neither offense of which defendant was acquitted is lesser-included offense of second-degree murder. In determining whether verdicts were legally…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pena-Rodriguez v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
- Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
- Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jarvis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Huggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Huggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
- Jarvis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
- Parkway Neuroscience v. Katz, Abosch, etc., PACourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.