Legal Opinion

Williams v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 25, 2022No. 37/21PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Nicholas Jabbar Williams v. State of Maryland, No. 37, September Term, 2021 ALLEGED LEGAL OR FACTUAL INCONSISTENCIES IN VERDICTS – NO- IMPEACHMENT RULE – MARYLAND RULE 5-606(b) – SUFFICIENCY OF THE EVIDENCE – Court of Appeals held that guilty verdict as to second-degree murder was not legally inconsistent with not-guilty verdicts as to first-degree assault and use of firearm in commission of crime of violence (second-degree murder) because neither offense of which defendant was acquitted is lesser-included offense of second-degree murder. In determining whether verdicts were legally…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. In Re WINSHIPSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Sullivan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Pena-Rodriguez v. ColoradoSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  4. Watkins v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. Gray v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Jarvis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  2. Huggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  3. Huggins v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2022
  4. Jarvis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2024
  5. Parkway Neuroscience v. Katz, Abosch, etc., PACourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API