Legal Opinion

Brockamp v. United States

District Court, C.D. California

Decided July 26, 1994No. CV 93-4601-RSWL (Sx)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

LEW, District Judge.

Plaintiff Marian Brockamp and Defendant United States of America each move for summary judgment regarding Plaintiffs action for recovery of a federal income tax refund. The central issue in this ease is whether the doctrine of equitable tolling applies to tax refund cases. After reviewing the arguments presented by both parties, this Court holds that equitable tolling does not apply in Plaintiffs case. Accordingly, Plaintiffs motion for summary judgment is DENIED and Defendant’s motion for summary judgment is GRANTED.

1. BACKGROUND

Plaintiff, Marian Brockamp, is the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Irwin v. Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. United States v. DalmSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Webb v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
  2. John A. Gabelman v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Murdock v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2012
  4. Porter v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1996
  5. Holtvogt v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API