Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Insurance v. Pitman

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided November 15, 2002No. 2001-438PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDalianis, J.

The defendant, Kenneth Pitman, appeals an order of the Superior Court (Sullivan, J.) granting summary judgment to the plaintiff, *500State Farm Mutual Insurance Co., denying uninsured motorist coverage under a policy owned by the defendant. We reverse and remand.

The trial court found the following undisputed facts. On the evening of December 31, 1999, the defendant, a police officer with the Manchester Police Department, worked a paid detail at Chantilly’s nightclub in Manchester. Throughout the evening, William Looney made two attempts to enter the nightclub, but was denied admittance. At some…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Vermont Mutual Insurance v. MalcolmSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1986
  2. Wendell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Leatherby Insurance Company v. WilloughbyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1975
  4. McIntosh v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  5. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. v. McMillanSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Folkman v. QuammeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. PetersenSupreme Court of Iowa · 2004
  3. Madeja v. MPB Corp.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. Concord General Mutual Insurance v. DoeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  5. Exeter Hospital, Inc. v. Steadfast Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API