Vestal v. Pickering
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCoshow, J.
It cannot be questioned that the state is competent to become the beneficiary of a last will and testament unless there is a statute prohibiting the state to exercise that power. There is no statute prohibiting this state from receiving property by will. It has been held that the United States government, which is a government of limited powers, is capable of receiving property by will unless prohibited by statute. Compare Dickson v. United States, 125 Mass. 311 (28 Am. Rep. 230), with United States v. Fox, 94 U. S. 315 (24 L. Ed. 192), affirmed in Re Fox, 52 N. Y. 530 (11 Am. Rep. 751).
There…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- In the Matter of Will of FoxNew York Court of Appeals · 1873
- Bell County v. AlexanderTexas Supreme Court · 1858
- In re John's WillOregon Supreme Court · 1896
- Raley v. Umatilla CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1887
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hansen v. Oregon Humane SocietyOregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Eugene School District No. 4 v. FiskOregon Supreme Court · 1938
- Hindman v. United StatesOregon Supreme Court · 1950
- MartinSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1935
- School District No. 7 v. WeissenfluhOregon Supreme Court · 1963
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.