Legal Opinion

Summerlin v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 21, 1953PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

The plaintiff has offered plenary evidence of actionable negligence on the part of the defendant. Edwards v. R. R., 129 N.C. 18, 39 S.E. 730; Goff v. R. R., 179 N.C. 216, 102 S.E. 320; Earwood v. R. R., 192 N.C. 27, 133 S.E. 180; Quinn v. R. R., 213 N.C. 48, 195 S.E. 85; Miller, Admr. v. Union Pac. R. R. Co., 290 U.S. 227, 78 L. Ed. 285.

However, the plaintiff according to her own evidence is guilty of contributory negligence, which bars her recovery. Her negligence need not be the sole proximate cause of her injury. It is enough if it, concurring with the negligence of the defendant,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Johnson v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  2. Miller v. Union Pacific R. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1933
  3. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Edwards v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1901
  5. Coleman v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1910

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brown v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API