Legal Opinion

The Florida Bar v. Ross

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided December 24, 1998No. 89,012PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

732 So.2d 1037 (1998)

THE FLORIDA BAR, Complainant,

v.

Alec Joseph ROSS, Respondent.

No. 89,012.

Supreme Court of Florida.

December 24, 1998.

Rehearing Denied May 6, 1999.

John F. Harkness, Jr., Executive Director and John Anthony Boggs, Staff Counsel, Tallahassee, and Cynthia Lindbloom, Bar Counsel, Miami, for Complainant.

Richard B. Marx, Miami, for Respondent.

2Per curiam

We have for review the referee's report and recommendations regarding alleged ethical violations by attorney Alec Joseph Ross. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 15, Fla. Const. For the reasons expressed in this opinion, we approve the referee's…

3Cases cited19 opinions

  1. The Florida Bar v. RueSupreme Court of Florida · 1994
  2. Walker v. BentleySupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  3. The Florida Bar v. GreeneSupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  4. The Florida Bar v. JacksonSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  5. The Florida Bar v. RendinaSupreme Court of Florida · 1991

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by14 opinions

  1. Statewide Grievance Committee v. BurtonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2007
  2. In Re Joseph D. MorrisseyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
  3. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. BallWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2006
  4. In Re C De BacaSupreme Court of Colorado · 2000
  5. The Florida Bar v. HaleSupreme Court of Florida · 2000

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API