Legal Opinion

Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Ball

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2006No. 31794PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDavis, C.J.

This is a lawyer disciplinary proceeding against John Patrick Ball (hereinafter referred to as “Mr. Ball”), by the Office of Disciplinary Counsel (hereinafter referred to as “the ODC”), on behalf of the Lawyer Disciplinary Board. A Hearing Panel Subcommittee (hereinafter “the Panel”), determined that Mr. Ball committed five violations of the Rules of Professional Conduct. 1 Consequently, the Panel and the ODC have recommended the following: (1) that Mr. Ball remain on inactive status and not practice law for a period of not less than five years; 2 (2) that after five years Mr. Ball must file…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Burrow v. ArceTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Committee on Legal Ethics of West Virginia State Bar v. BlairWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. McCorkleWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Krischbaum v. DillonOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Committee on Legal Ethics of the West Virginia State Bar v. WalkerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. In re Melvin FinkSupreme Court of Vermont · 2011
  2. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Ronald S. RossiWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. State v. HatleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Parkinson v. BevisIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
  5. Lawyer Disciplinary Board v. Edward R. KohoutWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2016

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API