Legal Opinion
Kuris v. Pepper Poultry Co.
New York Supreme Court
Decided July 23, 1940PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtEder, J.
The defendant, a foreign corporation, is engaged amongst other of its activities, in the interstate motor transportation of poultry. As such it is subject to the provisions of the Interstate Commerce Commission Act, chapter 8 of title 49 of the United States Code, sections 301 to 327, inclusive, known as the “ Motor Carrier Act, 1935,” under the jurisdiction of the Interstate Commerce Commission. It applied for and obtained from the Commission a permit or certificate of authority to operate as such interstate motor carrier.
It is provided by subdivision (a) of section 221 of said act (U. S.…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Adams v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1904
- Panhandle Oil Co. v. Mississippi Ex Rel. KnoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1928
- Gordon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
- Allen v. BaileySupreme Court of Colorado · 1932
- State v. ElmoreSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Frank Ocepek Frank Ocepek as Statutory Trustee for Best MacHines Invented, Inc. v. Corporate Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Madden v. Truckaway CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Blackledge v. LatouretteOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Trailer Exp., Inc. v. GammillMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
- Schneir v. TishmanAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1941
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.