Legal Opinion
Madden v. Truckaway Corporation
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 27, 1942No. 669PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NORDBYE, District Judge.
The question presented is whether valid service of process can be made on an agent appointed under Section 321(c), Title 49 U.S.C.A. (the Motor Carrier Act), in an action of this character against a non-resident corporation, which has never qualified to do business in this State; does not conduct any business herein; and has no property or any of its officers in this State. The defendant is engaged in the transportation business with its headquarters and domicile, in the State of Michigan. It transports mo* tor cars by truck and is authorized by the Interstate Commerce…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Hawaii v. MankichiSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Heydenfeldt v. Daney Gold and Silver Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Barrett v. Van PeltSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
- Thompson v. Terminal Shares, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Sansbury v. SchwartzDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1941
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Hirsch v. National Van Lines, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1983
- Frank Ocepek Frank Ocepek as Statutory Trustee for Best MacHines Invented, Inc. v. Corporate Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- Kelley v. KoettingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1948
- Davies v. MahanesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1950
- Davies v. MahanesDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1949
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.