Legal Opinion
Schneir v. Tishman
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided April 16, 1941PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMiller, J.
" Defendants, non-residents, were formerly engaged in the motor trucking business as copartners, doing business as M. P. S. Trucking Company. They operated in interstate com*428merce pursuant to authority granted to them by the Bureau of Motor Carriers of the Interstate Commerce Commission. To obtain the necessary certificate of convenience from the bureau defendants were, among other things, required to comply with subdivision (c) of section 221 of the Motor Carrier Act of 1935 (U. S. Code, tit. 49, § 321, subd. [c]), which provides that “ (c) * * * Every motor carrier shall also file with the
boa…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Claflin v. HousemanSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Central Vermont Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Gilbert v. BurnstineNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Fitzpatrick v. International Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1929
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Madden v. Truckaway CorporationDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1942
- State Ex Rel. Blackledge v. LatouretteOregon Supreme Court · 1949
- Trailer Exp., Inc. v. GammillMississippi Supreme Court · 1981
- Gerut v. PoeDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1951
- Olson v. Midstates Freight Lines, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.