Legal Opinion
Westinghouse Electric Corp. v. CX Processing Laboratories, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided August 28, 1975No. Nos. 72-3080, 72-3081PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Before CHOY and GOODWIN, Circuit Judges, and BURNS,* District Judge. BURNS, District Judge.
This is a contract dispute between Westinghouse Electric Corporation, a Pennsylvania manufacturer of Photo-flash cubes and bulbs (lamps), and CX Processing Laboratories, Inc., one of its Washington distributors. Jurisdiction is the result of diversity, pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 1332. CX’s counterclaim' also alleges that Westinghouse is guilty of antitrust violations prohibited by the Sherman Antitrust Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1 et seq. Jurisdiction is provided by 15 U.S.C. § 15.
FACTS:
Westinghouse is one of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- United States v. Colgate & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Times-Picayune Publishing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- White Motor Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Milton Borger and Richard Borger v. Yamaha International CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Eli Mesirow and Thomas Morris v. Pepperidge Farm, Inc., a Connecticut CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Fount-Wip, Inc. v. Reddi-Wip, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
- Roesch, Inc. And Marketing Division, Inc. v. Star Cooler Corporation, a Missouri Corporation Hussmann Refrigeration, Inc. And Tour Ice Midwest, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.