Legal Opinion
Filco v. Amana Refrigeration, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1983No. 81-4604PublishedCited by 52 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WALLACE, Circuit Judge:
Filco sued alleging that Amana Refrigeration, Inc. (Amana), Boulevard T.V. & Appliance, Inc. (Boulevard) and Lamco Appliance, Inc. (Lamco) conspired to fix prices in violation of section 1 of the Sherman Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1, and California’s Cartwright Act, CaLBus. & Prof.Code § 16720 (West 1964). Filco also asserted five other state law claims against Amana. The district court dismissed these latter claims after granting a motion for summary judgment on the Sherman Act and Cartwright Act claims. Filco appeals only from the summary judgment. We have jurisdiction under 28…
2Cases cited40 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- American Tobacco Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by52 opinions
- Roland MacHinery Company v. Dresser Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- Richards v. Nielsen Freight LinesDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1985
- John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & HowellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- World of Sleep, Inc. v. La-Z-Boy Chair Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- James Earle v. Robert BenoitCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1988
47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.