Legal Opinion

Trotter v. Nelson

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided April 24, 1996No. 57A05-9412-CV-472PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SHARPNACK, Chief Judge.

This case comes to us on interlocutory appeal. The sole issue raised is whether a fee splitting agreement between Stephen Trotter, a lawyer, and his nonlawyer employee violates public policy and is, therefore, unenforceable. Trotter appeals the denial of partial summary judgment by the trial court on the issue of breach of contract. We affirm.

Trotter is an attorney Hcensed to practice law in Indiana. Lesa Nelson is Trotter's former employee who worked for him from July 1986 until the end of 1989. Nelson is not admitted to practice law in any jurisdiction.

Nelson…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Rosi v. Business Furniture Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 1993
  2. Cowe Ex Rel. Cowe v. Forum Group, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Johnson County Rural Electric Membership Corp. v. BurnellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Allstate Insurance Co. v. BolesIndiana Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hogston v. BellIndiana Supreme Court · 1916

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Trotter v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Van Eaton v. FinkIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. William M. Freeman v. Richard A. Mayer and Spangler, Jennings & Dougherty, P.C.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
  4. Trotter v. NelsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API